04. Information Search
2024 Topic: Scents
Coordinator: Dr. Christopher DeSantis
The sense of smell has evolved over billions of years. Creatures use the sense of smell to identify one another, sense danger, find food, and perform other important activities. The senses of smell and taste work together to identify compounds. For example, when you have a stuffy nose, you cannot taste what you eat! These smelly compounds interact with specific molecules in your nose to send signals to the brain. This year’s Information Search event gives you a chance to investigate the structures of several chemicals that are a large part of unique odors.
This year’s Info Search event gives you a chance to investigate the structures of several chemicals that are a large part of unique scents. The scientific names, along with the associated scents and Chemical Abstracts Service Registry numbers, are:
(R)-(+)-limonene (orange) (CAS No. 5989-27-5) β-Ionone (cedar, violets) (CAS No. 14901-07-6)
(S)-2-methylbutyl acetate (fruity) (CAS No. 624-41-9) β-damascenone (rose) (CAS No. 23696-85-7)
Event-Specific Requirements:
-
A team of 2 or 3 students must compete in this event.
-
Schools with two teams MUST select different molecules to research and present. The two teams MUST compete in the same time slot.
-
BEFORE the day of the event, the team will select one of the molecules and make a molecular model using low-density Styrofoam balls and wooden skewers.
-
The team should be prepared to use the Internet to answer general knowledge questions about all the molecules in the Information Search portion of the event.
-
The information search portion of the event is to be completed in 25 minutes ON the day of competition.
-
The team should be prepared to answer two oral questions about their molecule.
- Question #1 will focus on molecular geometry (such as chirality, identifying co-planar atoms, hybridization, bond lengths, and angles).
- Question #2 will focus on the relationship between structure and function. Note: Students are not expected to know specific proprietary information about the compounds. However, students should understand the importance and role of different functional groups.
Model: The molecular model should be made using painted Styrofoam balls and wooden skewers. Most spray paints will cause Styrofoam to denature ("melt"); be careful to buy the special Styrofoam spray paint. Be aware that low-density Styrofoam balls crumble when rubbed together. Make sure to use protective gear as necessary when preparing your model; read the safety and usage information carefully on the glue and paint. Use different-sized Styrofoam balls to represent the relative sizes of atoms, and paint them according to the color code below. The maximum size permitted is 3-inch balls. Wooden skewers and glue are to be used for the bonds. The model may be mounted on cardboard or kept in a box for transportation; however, it must be fully visible on all sides during the live event to judge it properly. No other materials other than Styrofoam balls, paint, wooden skewers, and glue are permitted! Styrofoam balls, wooden skewers, glue, and Styrofoam spray paint can be purchased at Michaels or other craft stores. Wooden skewers may also be found at a supermarket (ex., Shop Rite). Color Code: Use black for carbon, white for hydrogen, red for oxygen, blue for nitrogen, green for chlorine, yellow for iodine, and orange for phosphorus. Points will be awarded both for technical correctness and design elegance. Your model will be judged as to how accurately it represents the molecule’s structure. The team must provide a key that includes information about atoms (key to atomic representations), bond angles, bond lengths, and hybridization in the molecule.
Event Day Information:
-
On event day, one team member should have a physical model prepared for judging. During the allocated session, each team will participate in the "Internet Search" and "Molecule Questioning" portions of the event.
-
In order to provide written answers to the four questions, each team will be provided with one computer with access to the Internet, a question sheet, and a pen. At the completion of the scheduled session, each team must submit their written answers to the questions provided. Questions may be about these molecules or other molecules of the same type, with the intention that the answer must be researched and cited.
-
There are only four written questions; they may be somewhat more difficult, and extra attention should be paid to properly cite the information provided. Answers with no citations will earn fewer points than properly cited answers. Standard academic integrity rules apply to the answers to the information search question.
-
Students may consult the List of Suggested Databases that has been developed for this event. Students may consult journal articles or scholarly (.edu) websites to research the compounds. Do not reference Google or media websites; only journal articles or scholarly (.edu) websites can be cited to earn points.
-
On the day of the competition, student teams will be asked two questions about their model. Teams will orally respond to the questions in order to demonstrate their knowledge and clarify their reasoning. Student responses should not exceed 3 minutes. Students may also be asked for points of clarification if there is any confusion about their model.
Judging Criteria:
-
Model construction, including bond and hybridization key (50%)
-
Answer to two oral questions about the model on Event day (25%)
-
Answers to four written information search questions on Event day (25%)
Scoring Rubric:
Model Construction |
100 |
75 |
50 |
25 |
5 |
Score |
Correctness of 3D model construction (including bond angles and bond length) |
3D model are scale |
Most of the information displayed the model is correct |
Some of the information displayed in the model is correct |
There is a considerable amount of missing information and/or errors |
Most information is missing and/or there are many errors in 3D model |
|
Design Elegance |
The model is neat, and the choices for “atoms” and “bonds” are high-level |
The model is neat, and choices for “atoms” and “bonds are good |
The model is neat, but there is some inconsistency in the design. |
Some inconsistency in design and lacks neatness |
There is much inconsistency in design and a lack of neatness |
|
Key items included (atomic code, bond angles, bond lengths, hybridization) |
All keys included and are correct |
The keys are mostly correct |
The keys are somewhat correct |
Most of the information is missing |
Key not included |
Oral Questions-Model |
50 |
40 |
30 |
20 |
10 |
Score |
Correctness of Question 1 |
Correct and thorough answer |
The answer is mostly correct |
The answer is somewhat correct |
The answer is vague |
Incorrect answer |
|
Correctness of Question 2 |
Correct and thorough answer |
The answer is mostly correct |
The answer is somewhat correct |
The answer is vague |
Incorrect answer |
|
All team members participated |
Evidence that all team members clearly understood their model |
All members had a basic understanding of their model |
All members participated but had a weak understanding of their model |
Only one member, who had a weak understanding of the model, participated in the discussion |
There is no evidence that team members understood their model |
Oral Questions: Information Search |
37.5 |
30 |
22.5 |
15 |
7.5 |
Score |
Correctness of Question 1 |
Correct and thorough answer |
The answer is mostly correct |
The answer is somewhat correct |
The answer is vague |
Incorrect answer |
|
Correctness of Question 2 |
Correct and thorough answer |
The answer is mostly correct |
The answer is somewhat correct |
The answer is vague |
Incorrect answer |
|
Correctness of Question 3 |
Correct and thorough answer |
The answer is mostly correct |
The answer is somewhat correct |
The answer is vague |
Incorrect answer |
|
Correctness of Question 4 |
Correct and thorough answer |
The answer is mostly correct |
The answer is somewhat correct |
The answer is vague |
Incorrect answer |